Heritage gull wrote:Glad I'm not married to you Brucie. Empathy, support...? Nup. :devil:

He's totally correct though IMO if a little brutal.
Heritage gull wrote:Glad I'm not married to you Brucie. Empathy, support...? Nup. :devil:
Behind-the-Gulls wrote:I suspect the situation during his driving ban(for speeding offences) didn't help as most weekends after home matches he couldn't get home and wouldn't have seen his family. I think its discriminatory to say he shouldn't or couldn't do the job again because of his depressive illness-lots of people including many famous and successful ones have suffered from such illnesses but bounced back from them after some time out.You could see a rejuvenated and remotivated manager coming back to the job.I would have thought the prospect of not returning to the job (or not being offered to)would be more damaging to his health.
That is because he caught his missus shagging his mate when he logged into his personal cctv system whilst on a tour abroad!SteveDeckchair wrote:Or you could get a Marcus Trescothick long term problem where he only feels happy when close to his family.
Harsh I know, but I am also of the feeling that once Martin is back on his feet, then we terminate his contract. this must be based on footballing reasons else we are opening ourselves up to an unfair dismissal claim.
My fear is that rather than dealing with the situation swiftly, this will drag on into the summer and we will start next season as a shambles. It is imperative that this doesn't happen!
Alan Knill is the future in my mind and unfortunately for Martin Ling, this has been brought home by our turn around in the last few weeks. Irrespective of his illness, the correct decision must be made in the club's best interests.
I couldn't agree more.brucie wrote:Its good news that Ling is not suffering from a serious illness then. Whether his problem is drink/stress related will we ever really know the truth?
However do we really want him back? - he will be living away from his family doing a job which is extremely stressful. He might be back in May but Knill is drawing up the retained list?
That is completely ridiculous - is it really up to the board to identify a weakness such as this in the manager?
Whatever the circumstances the situation with Ling has nigh on cost us our league status and should we escape do we want to run the risk of it happening next season.
Baker may say Ling has a right to come back but do we want a manager on the edge supported by a number 2 who has shown himself to be completely clueless.
I wouldn't want Ling back under any circumstances.
great post phil.Modgull wrote:
I couldn't agree more.
Ling was responsible, earlier in the season, for some of the poorest football I have had the misfortune to watch at Plainmoor. Although he cannot guarantee the performance of the players, the way he set us up for even home games guaranteed stale, negative football. And his assistant showed that he was unable to step up when the situation demanded it.
His illness, whatever it is (and it seems some of the rumours may have been true), and his absence has nearly cost us our league status - and could still do because Alan Knill still faces an uphill battle even if we do seem to have stopped the downward plunge for now.
This seems the worst of all worlds to me. A "thank you for getting us out of this mess Mr Knill but we don't want you however good you are" is hardly likely to build up the morale and fighting spirit of the playing side of the Club in its hour of need. And we then revert, whatever the outcome of the relegation dogfight, to the no-hope football we have seen previously.
Why should the supporters see this as anything other than depressing? Why should season ticket holders renew their tickets at the end of the season? This is crucial for the Club yet there seems to be no concept as to how this whole business looks from the sidelines.
I didn't hear many people moaning about it last season when we got into the playoffs......cambgull wrote:Well, I say this in the nicest way it can possibly be said, but this is the most depressing bit of good news I have ever heard.
As a person, I do like Lingy. He's open and honest and it was refreshing after Buckle.
As a manager, dear God he is clueless, and so is Taylor. There has never been a single successful manager in the history of football who sets his teams out to defend for 85 minutes every single match. It just doesn't work on a regular basis. Perhaps against better teams, but not every game.
After seeing what an attacking manager can do in a short space of time, I just could not mentally watch the utter drivel that Ling calls football. I suppose it's lucky I can never afford to go to games!
That's because we were winning games, still doesn't mean it wasn't rubbish football.Scott Brehaut wrote:I didn't hear many people moaning about it last season when we got into the playoffs......
Not quite right, but not entirely without merit.SteveDeckchair wrote:Or you could get a Marcus Trescothick long term problem where he only feels happy when close to his family.
Harsh I know, but I am also of the feeling that once Martin is back on his feet, then we terminate his contract. this must be based on footballing reasons else we are opening ourselves up to an unfair dismissal claim.
My fear is that rather than dealing with the situation swiftly, this will drag on into the summer and we will start next season as a shambles. It is imperative that this doesn't happen!
Alan Knill is the future in my mind and unfortunately for Martin Ling, this has been brought home by our turn around in the last few weeks. Irrespective of his illness, the correct decision must be made in the club's best interests.
Users browsing this forum: gullsgullsgulls, Hornblower2 and 494 guests