Makeup of The Board/Direction of TUFC
Posted: 17 Nov 2013, 20:44
I'd like to start this thread by just pointing out I have nothing but respect, thanks and admiration for what those at the club have done since the conference days. If you look at the club then and now the investment that has been made is incredible, most notably Bristow's Bench which at last gave us a ground to be proud of.
The point I suppose I'm making really is whether those at the club are fit for purpose in some of the decisions which have been taken. I've felt in particular that although the intentions have always been good, there is a certain lack of nous which has been absent ever since Colin Lee left the club. I'm not for one minute suggesting he would be the man to have back after the damage he did, but I've felt over the past few years not having someone who knows the football industry inside out at this level has cost us. It can be evidenced by the fact that ever since Buckle (who CL appointed) it has been a downward spiral, albeit one decent season under Ling. It was mentioned a little while ago that there is something like 14 directors in total - has this necessarily been the best model? It strikes me that when it comes to strong leadership the club has been found wanting - we have had musical chairs where the position of chairman is concerned, in the end it has gone to the woman who has made the biggest investment but who admits herself isn't a role which comes easy to her. Some of her programme notes (particularly of late) have been completely nonsensical to the point where it feels like she wants to divert attention away from what is going on behind the scenes. Certainly based on the few interviews I've seen I wouldn't say she seems comfortable in the position. Instead her predecessor who took the decision to appoint ML then dumped it on Thea to break the news of the sacking to Ling because it seemed to me he didn't have the guts to do it himself. You then have others like Bill Phillips and co and all I can say is that he seems to come across as a rather arrogant individual, I've no idea what he adds to the grand scheme of things.
I can't knock the club for appointing Knill, at the time I didn't have a problem with him being given the job and at the start of the season thought we should be ok but surely the point is at boardroom level there has to be another level of expertise - hence why CL was brought in by the board to begin with as none of them had the experience of running a football club. You have to wonder if there was someone in that position after the debacle of last season whether a bit of time would have been taken to find the right person to take the club forward rather than giving it to the popular choice at the time without stopping to think whether there was a better alternative out there. I suppose overall after the events of the last couple of seasons I fear what lies ahead and can't say I completely trust those in charge to make the right decisions.
The point I suppose I'm making really is whether those at the club are fit for purpose in some of the decisions which have been taken. I've felt in particular that although the intentions have always been good, there is a certain lack of nous which has been absent ever since Colin Lee left the club. I'm not for one minute suggesting he would be the man to have back after the damage he did, but I've felt over the past few years not having someone who knows the football industry inside out at this level has cost us. It can be evidenced by the fact that ever since Buckle (who CL appointed) it has been a downward spiral, albeit one decent season under Ling. It was mentioned a little while ago that there is something like 14 directors in total - has this necessarily been the best model? It strikes me that when it comes to strong leadership the club has been found wanting - we have had musical chairs where the position of chairman is concerned, in the end it has gone to the woman who has made the biggest investment but who admits herself isn't a role which comes easy to her. Some of her programme notes (particularly of late) have been completely nonsensical to the point where it feels like she wants to divert attention away from what is going on behind the scenes. Certainly based on the few interviews I've seen I wouldn't say she seems comfortable in the position. Instead her predecessor who took the decision to appoint ML then dumped it on Thea to break the news of the sacking to Ling because it seemed to me he didn't have the guts to do it himself. You then have others like Bill Phillips and co and all I can say is that he seems to come across as a rather arrogant individual, I've no idea what he adds to the grand scheme of things.
I can't knock the club for appointing Knill, at the time I didn't have a problem with him being given the job and at the start of the season thought we should be ok but surely the point is at boardroom level there has to be another level of expertise - hence why CL was brought in by the board to begin with as none of them had the experience of running a football club. You have to wonder if there was someone in that position after the debacle of last season whether a bit of time would have been taken to find the right person to take the club forward rather than giving it to the popular choice at the time without stopping to think whether there was a better alternative out there. I suppose overall after the events of the last couple of seasons I fear what lies ahead and can't say I completely trust those in charge to make the right decisions.