As tweeted by Lee Mansell, interesting.
I know we all knock the club from time to times...
Best and Worst League Club 2012
-
- Vice Captain
- Posts: 547
- Joined: 14 Nov 2010, 18:21
- Location: Worthing, West Sussex
- happytorq
- Plays for Country
- Posts: 2597
- Joined: 07 Sep 2010, 01:21
- Favourite player: Kevin Hill
- Location: Newtown, Connecticut, USA
- Watches from: The sofa
Ah, statistics. They're great.
It looks nice but this table doesn't mean anything at all. We're not the 8th best league club in 2012. If anything that shows our mediocrity; good enough to be decent, but not good enough to get promoted (our average points would almost certainly had nosedived if we'd gone up)
It looks nice but this table doesn't mean anything at all. We're not the 8th best league club in 2012. If anything that shows our mediocrity; good enough to be decent, but not good enough to get promoted (our average points would almost certainly had nosedived if we'd gone up)
Images for Avatar Copyright Historical Football Kits and reproduced by kind permission.
Eam non defectum. Ego potest tractare quod. Est spes occidit me.
Eam non defectum. Ego potest tractare quod. Est spes occidit me.
- SuperNickyWroe
- Legend
- Posts: 8228
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 21:49
- Favourite player: Andy Provan
- Location: Sunny Barnsley, Yorkshire
- Watches from: The sofa
- Contact:
it looks accurate enough to me judging by the team in 90th place.........happytorq wrote:Ah, statistics. They're great.
It looks nice but this table doesn't mean anything at all. We're not the 8th best league club in 2012. If anything that shows our mediocrity; good enough to be decent, but not good enough to get promoted (our average points would almost certainly had nosedived if we'd gone up)


even worse than hartlepool......unbelievable Jeff! =D
Member of the Yorkshire Gulls Supporters Club - Sponsors of Lirak Hasani, 2024-2025
Driving South to all games!
TUST Member 468

Driving South to all games!
TUST Member 468

-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
I see that there is room for criticism, given that it takes into account promoted/relegated teams who are, perhaps, in inappropriate divisions, but otherwise, I think it's excellent analysis. It takes a constant (points awarded for a win, loss and draw) and allows teams banded by division (those of similar ability, budget etc) to rank against each other. It does require the reader to accept that the best team over a given period is the one which gains most points, but over the course of a calendar year, this is probably the case. I like it.
Matt.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests