Page 5 of 11
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:04
by Dave_Pougher
Modgull wrote:2-5 ft ho ho
What ever the arguments for against Buckle/Ling we can't get away from the fact that what Rovers are going through now that could have been us had he stayed!
Gees God.
Thank you Paul !
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:06
by divingbboy
Oh, well, Paul. I'm sure there must be a couple of Conference South teams looking for a young and ambitious manager such as yourself.
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:09
by Neal
If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull

Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:10
by Plymouth Gull
Dave_Pougher wrote:
What ever the arguments for against Buckle/Ling we can't get away from the fact that what Rovers are going through now that could have been us had he stayed!
Gees God.
Thank you Paul !
Difficult to say that. Had he stayed, Branston would be here, Stanley, Zebs, probably Robinson & Tomlin would be here. What positions they'd be playing in though is anyones guess!

Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:26
by stevegull
NickGull wrote:
Difficult to say that. Had he stayed, Branston would be here, Stanley, Zebs, probably Robinson & Tomlin would be here. What positions they'd be playing in though is anyones guess!

Now that's not fair. Branston could do a decent job on the right wing!

Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:32
by Dave
and Tomlin could have played in goal, iam sure

Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:44
by Burnhamgull
Neal wrote:If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull

Are you kidding? Funniest thing on the web tonight

Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:45
by Modgull
Neal wrote:If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull

Yes, just spent a happy half hour reading all the comments about PB and his team!
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 18:04
by Neal
hahaha me too I cant keep away, its so amusing!
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 18:16
by Neal
mmmmm.... they dont want anymore Torquay rejects it seems, Leroy was at the game
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 09:03
by Modgull
Neal wrote:mmmmm.... they dont want anymore Torquay rejects it seems, Leroy was at the game
I guess that puts paid to the "Robbo to Rovers in the transfer window" thread
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 09:45
by Dave_Pougher
Neal wrote:If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull

♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
Don't post if you cant be nice
Don't post if you cant be nice
lol
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 10:53
by Neal
Mmmmm.... not so sure now, looks like Buckle is staying and has the go ahead to get 3 or 4 new players including 2 CB's, like urgently. The fans dont want any more Torquay rejects, but will Buckle worry about that, mmmmm... doubt it.
I reckon Buckle will try and come here as he knows we are an easy touch and we have 3 good CB's.
This saga could continue guys.
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 13:00
by wodger of awabia
Re: Ling v Buckle
Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 13:06
by wodger of awabia