Page 20 of 22

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 14:46
by Scott Brehaut
CP Gull wrote:Yes Nick, having listened to the David Thoms podcast, he has now had the opportunity to look closely at the DVD and it appears if anything it was the young Rovers striker (Harrison) who was the aggressor and put his face into MacDonald's. The club are considering appealing the red card for MacDonald as it appears all he was (actually) guilty of was swiping a corner flag with his hand - hardly the sort of thing that should warrant a second yellow card!
I didn't think you could appeal a red if it was given for a second bookable offence?

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 14:55
by ethantufcbaker
Scott Brehaut wrote: I didn't think you could appeal a red if it was given for a second bookable offence?
you cant because you cant appeal yellow cards

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 15:03
by CP Gull
Scott Brehaut wrote: I didn't think you could appeal a red if it was given for a second bookable offence?
Quite right. I think the club are clutching at straws tbh. I can only imagine they are trying to see whether it can be treated as a "special case" as ultimately THAT decision has not only (probably) cost us 2 points but also cost young MacDonald a 2 game ban. Based on what I can see from the video footage (link earlier) the only thing MacDonald could be guilty of is swinging his arms around, but given that no contact was made and it certainly didn't impede their striker's attempt to get to the ball, it is a daft decision. You could even argue that the ball was already out of play when the "offence" occurred anyway which means that the ball is "dead". At most, I think a ticking off for both of them (MacDonald and Harrison) and a goal kick to us would have been the correct decision!

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 18:17
by Kit_robin
Not sure where the normally well informed Dave Thomas is getting the handball thing from; the linesman on boxing day was clearly holding his flag horizontally stretched in front of him. The signal for offside or goal kick. At no point did he wave his flag for a foul.

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 18:19
by ethantufcbaker

Highlights

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 18:20
by ethantufcbaker
Kit_robin wrote:Not sure where the normally well informed Dave Thomas is getting the handball thing from; the linesman on boxing day was clearly holding his flag horizontally stretched in front of him. The signal for offside or goal kick. At no point did he wave his flag for a foul.
The refs report said handball

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 18:32
by Kit_robin
ethantufcbaker wrote: The refs report said handball
Who's seen that then? Watch the official rovers highlights. The linesman flags for offside. The referee when he blows his whistle pits his arm in the air and signals a straight line with his other arm. The decision on the pitch was clearly offside. If the report says different you can only assume they realise they got it wrong and are trying to cover themselves. Anyway, do they write about disallowed goals in refs reports? Why would they? Just an infringement isn't it?

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 18:34
by ethantufcbaker
Kit_robin wrote: Who's seen that then? Watch the official rovers highlights. The linesman flags for offside. The referee when he blows his whistle pits his arm in the air and signals a straight line with his other arm. The decision on the pitch was clearly offside. If the report says different you can only assume they realise they got it wrong and are trying to cover themselves. Anyway, do they write about disallowed goals in refs reports? Why would they? Just an infringement isn't it?
I agree I was at the match and saw it was given as off side you can hear me saying "hes Offside" and yes it was probably a cover up. Fouls and infringements are all in the refs report usually

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 18:46
by Gulliball
I can't see anything in the video to justify a penalty. Even watching MacDonald, who it seems it was given against, I really can't see anything out of the ordinary. Hopefully we can use any anger from this to spur us on to a run of wins. We've played a lot of the better sides now, so it is time to capitalise against the rest, starting with revenge against Alfreton on Sunday.

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 19:14
by Kit_robin
Must say after watching the video I am even more angry than I was at the game yesterday! I presumed it was an extremely soft pen for the usual jostling that goes on in the box, but there is nothing to suggest MacDonald has done anything. To me, it's a 50-50 challenge, but if anything Harrison is on the back of MacDonald.

I would love to speak to the linesman (for his own safety it would have to be by phone), and ask him what he's seen. He's completely made up a foul. Someone bunged him £50? I normally say that as a joke but this time you have to wonder....

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 19:38
by Rjc70
Friendlygas seemed convinced yesterday, but looking at that there is potentially a foul on MacDonald, but I cannot for the life of me see how that can be seen as a penalty against us. I think the officials have cost us two points yesterday. How the hell is that a penalty.

And by the sounds of it an undeserved one point on Boxing Day, though I have yet to look at the Benyon effort.

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 19:43
by wivelgull
The Bristol Rovers bloke looks like a werewolf.

(p.s. I have consulted the Political Correctness Rules (all 257,664 of them) and yes, you are allowed to say 'werewolf'.

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 19:58
by tufc si
Could have done without watching that if I'm honest, just ruined my Friday evening! :@

Absolute injustice that penno was and by rights, should there fella not have seen a straight red for pushing his head into Gus?!? Would have been another soft red but I thought that sort of thing was frowned upon and could be classed as aggressive behaviour!! Certainly no worse than a little slap of the corner flag!!!

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 19:58
by Dutchgull
On that evidence on this occasion Friendly gas is really talking crap. Very evident that Ellis Harrison committed a foul on MacDonalad and stuck his head in his face . Jeez Bowman was sent off for less that that ! Absolute travesty even their commentator said so.

Brucie from his arm chair is right !!

TUFC.V.BRFC boxing/new years day match thread.

Posted: 02 Jan 2015, 20:12
by chunkygull
tufc si wrote:Could have done without watching that if I'm honest, just ruined my Friday evening! :@

Absolute injustice that penno was and by rights, should there fella not have seen a straight red for pushing his head into Gus?!? Would have been another soft red but I thought that sort of thing was frowned upon and could be classed as aggressive behaviour!! Certainly no worse than a little slap of the corner flag!!!
Spot on! I was thinking that myself about the lad sticking his head in, albeit not very aggressively. Cant believe in that non eventful action we conceded a pen and our player, who was being grabbed from behind, who then got lightly nutted, was the one sent off. Those officials were absolutely determined to give Rovers something. :@