Downes & Nico.
-
- Skipper
- Posts: 736
- Joined: 17 Jun 2012, 08:14
- Favourite player: Aaron Downes
Sometimes certain players are not another managers cup of tea. It's all about opinions and Downsey is great in the air but not so good on the floor so even with the goals he has scored maybe Hargreaves wants to play from the back and Downes is not up to it ... Just a thought !
27 goals scored this season with Chapel and Downes having scored 33% of them. Neither can make the match day squad when your deep in the mire and needing a goal.supergulls wrote:Sometimes certain players are not another managers cup of tea. It's all about opinions and Downsey is great in the air but not so good on the floor so even with the goals he has scored maybe Hargreaves wants to play from the back and Downes is not up to it ... Just a thought !
Cut your nose off to spite your face, springs to mind.
Life is like TUFC. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. 

27 goals scored this season with Chapel and Downes having scored 33% of them. Neither can make the match day squad when your deep in the mire and needing a goal.supergulls wrote:Sometimes certain players are not another managers cup of tea. It's all about opinions and Downsey is great in the air but not so good on the floor so even with the goals he has scored maybe Hargreaves wants to play from the back and Downes is not up to it ... Just a thought !
Cut your nose off to spite your face, springs to mind.
Life is like TUFC. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. 

I Don't think anyone is, SNW haha!SuperNickyWroe wrote: its quite apparent that CH isnt a fan of many of the players.
I'm abbreviating you to SNW now

We'll be back...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
No. The whole foundation upon which you base your premise is so flawed that it would take me at least 10,000 words to explain it all to you properly. I love you, Eddy, but I simply don't care enough.EddUK12 wrote:Matt how is it false logic?
surely if the players wages go down by 20% then costs go down by 20% which could be passed on to the supporters and the club could still make a loss of 500k (as they did in the last accounts) and a training ground they cant use.
im sure if wages went up as a result of promotion prices would go up.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
If it's not false logic, ask yourself why tickets for Man United (whose players earn 300x what ours do) aren't 300x the price of ours.
Matt.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
-
- Plays for Country
- Posts: 2911
- Joined: 02 Oct 2010, 00:29
- Favourite player: All Of Them
- Location: Sunny St Neots
I'm with Matt on this one I'm afraid. Don't ever start a business Edd as you'll be bankrupt within a year.EddUK12 wrote:Matt how is it false logic?
surely if the players wages go down by 20% then costs go down by 20% which could be passed on to the supporters and the club could still make a loss of 500k (as they did in the last accounts) and a training ground they cant use.
im sure if wages went up as a result of promotion prices would go up.
For a start, wages being reduced by 20% does not mean a 20% reduction in costs as it is not the only cost.
For example, if wages equate to 50% of the total outgoings over a year, a 20% drop in wages would be equivalent to a 10% drop in costs.
And why on earth would the club wish to maintain a 500k loss?! That would be quite simply moronic.
Luke.
"Successful applicants need not apply"
"Successful applicants need not apply"
-
- Reserve Player
- Posts: 52
- Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 21:24
- Favourite player: ALAN WELSH
good for you
-
- Reserve Player
- Posts: 52
- Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 21:24
- Favourite player: ALAN WELSH
I would think after the York game it was an easy decision to leave Nicholson out , he has only kept his place because cruise has been injured , he was like a snail , he couldn't get back , he gifted them a goal they couldn't take . words fail me with this chap, sorry not being rude to him , but he is woeful, but he thinks he **** brilliant . I think theres a job going as barman next year . poor downes has been slower since his knee injury before xmas , so much so he doesn't look like scoring from set pieces these days , o'conner and pearce are as good as any 2 central backs in this league , sadly we wont have either next year .
TUFC's income goes down with loss of money directly related to FL membership, if that helps. And yes, as has been said, making another £500k loss (it wasn't that figure, though) is not a sustainable business model.EddUK12 wrote:Matt how is it false logic?
surely if the players wages go down by 20% then costs go down by 20% which could be passed on to the supporters and the club could still make a loss of 500k (as they did in the last accounts) and a training ground they cant use.
im sure if wages went up as a result of promotion prices would go up.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: 21 Jul 2011, 23:30
- Contact:
Er.. their crowds and TV income are 300x bigger...??ferrarilover wrote:If it's not false logic, ask yourself why tickets for Man United (whose players earn 300x what ours do) aren't 300x the price of ours.
Matt.

Did you see the first line of my previous post on this thread, Edd? Club's income takes a massive hit from loss of FL status. £2.15m over three years (calculated on another site) if we don't come back in that time.
I'd be all in favour of a small discount for those existing ST holders renewing, if it was felt affordable. But it's not me potentially missing out on £2.15m funding over three years and recording losses where I presently have that funding. If they do reverse their previous announcement, fair play to them. I'd understand if they didn't, given the above.
The Directors won't forget in a hurry Colin Lee's offer on season tickets last time we fell out of the FL. An analysis of our recently published accounts (again on another site) show clearly that this coincided with a period that saw the worst recorded financial losses in TUFC's entire history. Not all down to the season ticket offer, granted.
Also, the point made previously that 500k losses year on year does not represent a sustainable business model still stands. Even though that figure isn't the correct figure.
I'd be all in favour of a small discount for those existing ST holders renewing, if it was felt affordable. But it's not me potentially missing out on £2.15m funding over three years and recording losses where I presently have that funding. If they do reverse their previous announcement, fair play to them. I'd understand if they didn't, given the above.
The Directors won't forget in a hurry Colin Lee's offer on season tickets last time we fell out of the FL. An analysis of our recently published accounts (again on another site) show clearly that this coincided with a period that saw the worst recorded financial losses in TUFC's entire history. Not all down to the season ticket offer, granted.
Also, the point made previously that 500k losses year on year does not represent a sustainable business model still stands. Even though that figure isn't the correct figure.
Last edited by Rjc70 on 07 Apr 2014, 06:02, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
quote="EddUK12"]Matt - as has been pointed out man utd have a multi million pound tv deal in many countries and spinsirship and they also have 90,000 people turn up every week to watch.
Camb - according to matt in another thread the reason there was a loss is due to the new stand and a training ground. Wages are not the only cost and there are a range of fixed costs such as seats which are not used on match day, most likey due to cost, i think one of the better gates recently was when there was a deal for kids to come along a reduced rate, if only the club would notic that, missed oppertunities like that are moronic.
Considering that the club and some fans think the torbay public should support the club when the average person hears the players will get 20% pay decease but prices will stay the same for a sub standard product the club should reconise this by lowering prices, it would be good pr for them.[/quote]
Goggle "price elasticity of demand" and go from there.
Half the reason we're in the shit we are is because of the last time some clownshoes with no idea tried to 'earn some good PR' by charging about 75p for a ST. Are you Colin Lee in disguise?
Matt.
Camb - according to matt in another thread the reason there was a loss is due to the new stand and a training ground. Wages are not the only cost and there are a range of fixed costs such as seats which are not used on match day, most likey due to cost, i think one of the better gates recently was when there was a deal for kids to come along a reduced rate, if only the club would notic that, missed oppertunities like that are moronic.
Considering that the club and some fans think the torbay public should support the club when the average person hears the players will get 20% pay decease but prices will stay the same for a sub standard product the club should reconise this by lowering prices, it would be good pr for them.[/quote]
Goggle "price elasticity of demand" and go from there.
Half the reason we're in the shit we are is because of the last time some clownshoes with no idea tried to 'earn some good PR' by charging about 75p for a ST. Are you Colin Lee in disguise?
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
Proof, were it needed, that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
My 10000 word prediction may have been optimistic. Between three of us, we're up to a thousand already and you're definitely not 10% of the way to understanding.
Matt.
My 10000 word prediction may have been optimistic. Between three of us, we're up to a thousand already and you're definitely not 10% of the way to understanding.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
Did you write this deliberately to wind some other posters up, hope so, otherwise your guilty of your own false logic.ferrarilover wrote:If it's not false logic, ask yourself why tickets for Man United (whose players earn 300x what ours do) aren't 300x the price of ours.
Matt.

Formerly known as forevertufc
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CourtierGull, gullsgullsgulls, MellowYellow, PainInTheGULLiver85, TheYellowFromExeter, westbaygull and 202 guests