I wrote that and as I clicked Submit it got held in the queue by your poststefano wrote: .... and there was me thinking you'd joined my gang!Ok Group 6 is fine for me

I wrote that and as I clicked Submit it got held in the queue by your poststefano wrote: .... and there was me thinking you'd joined my gang!Ok Group 6 is fine for me
Hi Jerry me again :na:Jerry wrote: I lost count of the hours I spent on here (when I should have been working, a bit like now! :Oops: ) trying to convince people (mostly Forevertufc if I recall correctly) that we were in a comfortable upper mid-table position before Ling went sick.
I should clarify my "group 2" position in that I'm not as anti-Knill as Rich's description. He's been desperately unlucky and (as Matt regularly struggles to point out) many of the performances show we should be should be well clear of any relegation fight this season.
Southampton Gull wrote:His "illness" would have impacted before he stepped down though Dave, so current form from that particular part of his reign is unjust IMHO.
Sorry, I wasn't intending to start this debate again as it's obvious we see things differently and no amount of arguing will persuade us otherwise!forevertufc wrote:
Hi Jerry me again :na:
In answer, I have lost count of the hours I have spent trying to convince you and many others, that this comfortable position we were when Martin Ling went sick, was an entirely false position, some keep banging about results, AK is not getting results, Martin Ling was, sorry for the caps but..MARTIN LING WAS NOT GETTING RESULTS EITHER.
Lingy's last game was Jan 15th, have a look for yourself, current form is measured over 6 games, Martin Ling's last 6 games were Played 6 won 0 drawn 3 lost 3, ok lets be fair and take that over his last 12 games record stands at Played 12 won 2 drawn 4 lost 6 not much improvment there either, and more than enough evidence that we were already on a huge nose dive before Martin Ling went sick, so please lets stop banging about how life was so much better under Martin Ling.
Or for Rotherham fans, section 5.chunkygull wrote:i dont know about people being in a group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, but there are definitely quite a few on our forum that would fall into the category of a section 8. :}
No Andy you are not and are far from it.AustrianAndyGull wrote:Am I poisonous then? I sincerely hope that is not people's opinions of me however if it is then that is not my problem.
Richinns wrote: No Andy you are not and are far from it.
You have not started calling for his head and have given some feeling of balance regards the bad luck we have had.
Personally I would give him a little more time before I display the worry you currently show but that is just our opinions and who knows what is right and wrong.
Users browsing this forum: UnitedinDevon and 305 guests