Page 2 of 3
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 15:36
by Richinns
I think we need to realise Rene was off - no matter what. Shame to see him go but has been sat on a contract offer sine x-mas so never had any real intention of staying it would seem.
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 15:45
by AustrianAndyGull
Yep agree, as soon as we began struggling i was resigned to losing Rene, especially as he is now available on a free. Why would he want to stay at Torquay and struggling when he can go to a slightly bigger club on more money? I'm not fussed who he goes to not even if it's Argyle or Pompey. We move on.
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 16:08
by Trojan 67
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 16:25
by ferrarilover
We won't struggle to replace the 9 goals he got (real goals) last season. Bye Rene, have fun t'up north earning an extra couple of quid and wandering about disinterestedly.
Matt.
Oddly harsh from me, not really sure what he's done to me...
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 16:30
by AustrianAndyGull
ferrarilover wrote:We won't struggle to replace the 9 goals he got (real goals) last season. Bye Rene, have fun t'up north earning an extra couple of quid and wandering about disinterestedly.
Matt.
Oddly harsh from me, not really sure what he's done to me...
Just have to pull you up there Matt on you're use of the letter 't' for Yorkshire references. In this instance you needn't have included one mate. If it had been 'to the north' then you could have put t'north but in your example it is unecessary.
:na:
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 16:46
by ferrarilover
I know that, Andy, that's all part of the (t') joke.
Matt.
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 16:54
by cambgull
Just have to pull you up there Andy on your use of the word "you're". In this instance you needn't have included the apostrope and the letter 'e' mate. If it had been 'you are' then you could have put you're but in your example it was unnecessary.
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 17:01
by Trojan 67
Eff huck kin ell, grammar pedants are bad enough, but now dialect pedants have stepped up to the plate and swiped the biscuit.
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 17:02
by ferrarilover
SAY NO TO GRAMMAR NAZI'S...
Matt.
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 17:10
by Trojan 67
Tie pin earors are knot speeling misstayks.
Every dilexsick loves Dilexsicks Midknight Rnnuers . . . . . .
Come on Eileen . . . . . .
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 17:24
by AustrianAndyGull
cambgull wrote:Just have to pull you up there Andy on your use of the word "you're". In this instance you needn't have included the apostrope and the letter 'e' mate. If it had been 'you are' then you could have put you're but in your example it was unnecessary.
Haha, bang to rights! :Oops:
On the Rene thing, i happen to agree with Matt. He did score some special goals out of nothing admittedly but some of his tally were penalties and he was also pretty much none existant as a goalscorer post-Christmas. Great player at this level but there are plenty more fish in the sea.
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 20:13
by wivelgull
The grammar Nazis surely (Nazi's is the genitive singular).
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 20:39
by ferrarilover
wivelgull wrote:The grammar Nazis surely (Nazi's is the genitive singular).
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 20:42
by cambgull
Making full use of your newly learnt skill, I see!
Re: You might not believe it but !!!
Posted: 08 May 2013, 20:45
by ferrarilover
I am indeed. I tried it before without the parrot and it doesn't have the same impact or effect, so I decided to go the whole hog this time round.
Not a graphic designer, are you?
Matt.