Re: Adam Birchall?
Posted: 11 Jul 2011, 17:42
Yeah, just a little bit Matt
When you look at some of the figures paid for similar players to Zebs then our deal does look an awful piece of business. A combination of a weak board and Buckle knowing that was the case after what happened with Elliot. I personally think that once a player has said he wants to go then the best option is to sell, but only if the price is right. For the money we've apparently recieved I think we should have said no, and kept him. Would rather have an unhappy Zebs, than no Zebs and 40k, though that is dependant on who ML can bring in.
When you look at some of the figures paid for similar players to Zebs then our deal does look an awful piece of business. A combination of a weak board and Buckle knowing that was the case after what happened with Elliot. I personally think that once a player has said he wants to go then the best option is to sell, but only if the price is right. For the money we've apparently recieved I think we should have said no, and kept him. Would rather have an unhappy Zebs, than no Zebs and 40k, though that is dependant on who ML can bring in.