by bobby93 » 03 Jul 2012, 11:06
Agree with a lot of this. Even while Buckle was here, we were a club who, as Ben says, have been realistic and respected the Leagues we've been in.
I also agree that I probably wouldn't have any of those players back again. Not necessarily through any ill feeling, I don't think we can blame the likes of Branno for going on and trying his luck in front of 10,000 people every week or even Robertson/Ellis for wanting to have a go in a higher league. What sometimes does bother us is the manner in which players seem to think they can behave. The likes of Stanley and Carayol are the characters who seem to attract the negative attention because of the way they left.
Loyalty does seem to be a rare quality across football, but I think at our club we do a lot to accept players and give them a chance. Nathan Craig, for example, is probably over the moon to have received such a postive reaction from a group of fans from which the majority have not yet seen him kick a ball. We've never been a club to stand in anyone's way, nor should we be. Football is, after all, a profession. If you were unhappy with a few aspects of your job or wanted to try for a promotion or a wage increase or a relocation, you'd do so and footballers are no different. I think they way Eunan has handled his suitors this summer (and the whole time he's been here) has been exceptional and should be an example to younger players. He's obviously got a very mature head on young shoulders, is in no rush to make a rash decision for money or anything else, and is fully appreciative of the fans and staff at the club he's at. For that reason, when he goes, we'll all wish him luck and remember him fondly, I'm sure.
The reason I wouldn't have most of those players back is because we've moved on. We've wished them well and we've replaced them. I was worried when there were rumours that we'd take Branno back just because he said he was interested, and he seemed like he was assuming he could just walk back into the team. He was fantastic when he was here, don't get me wrong. But Mr Ling has proved he's his own man. It's fine to remember the likes of Branston and what a success they were when they were here but we don't owe anybody anything and there are still plenty of wabbits to come out of the 'at, I'm sure.
I'm not sure if any of that made sense, it was sort of a train of thought exercise...
Agree with a lot of this. Even while Buckle was here, we were a club who, as Ben says, have been realistic and respected the Leagues we've been in.
I also agree that I probably wouldn't have any of those players back again. Not necessarily through any ill feeling, I don't think we can blame the likes of Branno for going on and trying his luck in front of 10,000 people every week or even Robertson/Ellis for wanting to have a go in a higher league. What sometimes does bother us is the manner in which players seem to think they can behave. The likes of Stanley and Carayol are the characters who seem to attract the negative attention because of the way they left.
Loyalty does seem to be a rare quality across football, but I think at our club we do a lot to accept players and give them a chance. Nathan Craig, for example, is probably over the moon to have received such a postive reaction from a group of fans from which the majority have not yet seen him kick a ball. We've never been a club to stand in anyone's way, nor should we be. Football is, after all, a profession. If you were unhappy with a few aspects of your job or wanted to try for a promotion or a wage increase or a relocation, you'd do so and footballers are no different. I think they way Eunan has handled his suitors this summer (and the whole time he's been here) has been exceptional and should be an example to younger players. He's obviously got a very mature head on young shoulders, is in no rush to make a rash decision for money or anything else, and is fully appreciative of the fans and staff at the club he's at. For that reason, when he goes, we'll all wish him luck and remember him fondly, I'm sure.
The reason I wouldn't have most of those players back is because we've moved on. We've wished them well and we've replaced them. I was worried when there were rumours that we'd take Branno back just because he said he was interested, and he seemed like he was assuming he could just walk back into the team. He was fantastic when he was here, don't get me wrong. But Mr Ling has proved he's his own man. It's fine to remember the likes of Branston and what a success they were when they were here but we don't owe anybody anything and there are still plenty of wabbits to come out of the 'at, I'm sure.
I'm not sure if any of that made sense, it was sort of a train of thought exercise...