by Dave » 01 Feb 2013, 09:39
Where does it come from, maybe from the spin doctors from within who are very good at telling people what they want them to hear.
Bristow's Bench was built at a build cost around £2m I know the club did not fully fund the entire cost it did fund part of it though, according to Nickgulls post the other day the training ground is costing £300k, plus other projects that have undertaken not with out cost, if allowed the club would like pay out £600k for a 3G pitch yes that may well pay for itself, however would have to be fully funded in the first instance. The club is potless and skint...really..?
Stating the obvious, more a case I think of funds needed to develop a healthy competative infrustructure as a priority, which is important, however there has to be a balance surely. Someone must realise soon that a on the other hand you also need a competative team aswell, if the club keeps ploughing funds into off the field projects and not into the team, we will end up back in the conference at some point, only difference is this time we will have some really nice gear.
Looking at the buisness done by league 2 clubs, think Cheltenham may have gone down the promotion or bust route, and some other clubs have taken a gamble, personaly glad our club does not nor will not go down that route. However if the team contiues to go backwards then the club will, the squad as a whole is going to need a tweak in the summer, so a few extra quid from the board will be needed.
Sorry forgot to say, one of the major losers in yesterdays transfer dealing could well be Plymouth, after the team bottom of the league spent 25k on Harry pell and picked up Gary Alexander on loan from creepy, with Rovers on a flyer and other clubs getting reults, Plymouth having played 2 games more could well in it deep now.
Where does it come from, maybe from the spin doctors from within who are very good at telling people what they want them to hear.
Bristow's Bench was built at a build cost around £2m I know the club did not fully fund the entire cost it did fund part of it though, according to Nickgulls post the other day the training ground is costing £300k, plus other projects that have undertaken not with out cost, if allowed the club would like pay out £600k for a 3G pitch yes that may well pay for itself, however would have to be fully funded in the first instance. The club is potless and skint...really..?
Stating the obvious, more a case I think of funds needed to develop a healthy competative infrustructure as a priority, which is important, however there has to be a balance surely. Someone must realise soon that a on the other hand you also need a competative team aswell, if the club keeps ploughing funds into off the field projects and not into the team, we will end up back in the conference at some point, only difference is this time we will have some really nice gear.
Looking at the buisness done by league 2 clubs, think Cheltenham may have gone down the promotion or bust route, and some other clubs have taken a gamble, personaly glad our club does not nor will not go down that route. However if the team contiues to go backwards then the club will, the squad as a whole is going to need a tweak in the summer, so a few extra quid from the board will be needed.
Sorry forgot to say, one of the major losers in yesterdays transfer dealing could well be Plymouth, after the team bottom of the league spent 25k on Harry pell and picked up Gary Alexander on loan from creepy, with Rovers on a flyer and other clubs getting reults, Plymouth having played 2 games more could well in it deep now.