Squad numbers

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Squad numbers

Re: Squad numbers

by bobby93 » 12 Jul 2012, 17:59

NickGull wrote:On the OS now.

No real surprises;

Poke #1
Oastler #2
Lathrope #6
Jarvis #8
Bodin #15
Easton #18
Craig #20
Cruise #21

#4 is left available for the new CB, I guess.
So Saah is #5 then?

Re: Squad numbers

by happytorq » 12 Jul 2012, 14:53

Richinns wrote:Your septic sports are not welcome on here!
Haha! I almost clarified that by saying that I really hate basketball.

To be fair, Steve Nash is a genuine footy fan - grew up playing the game. his brother was a professional player (played for Canada). Nash is part-owner of the Vancouver Whitecaps, plus he's a Spurs fan (his dad was from Tottenham, apparently).

If you happen to be in NYC in the summer you can often see him playing in central park; he organises pick up games there.

Re: Squad numbers

by Richinns » 12 Jul 2012, 14:44

happytorq wrote: Yep - the LA Lakers just acquired Steve Nash and he tool number 10 because he's a huge football fans and says that its the number his 'favourite playmakers' used to wear.
Your septic sports are not welcome on here!

Re: Squad numbers

by happytorq » 12 Jul 2012, 14:39

forevertufc wrote:Squad numbers these days are no indication of who is higher up the pecking order, or likely to be in the first starting 11.

Many player prefer numbers for sentimental even supersitious reasons etc etc.
Yep - the LA Lakers just acquired Steve Nash and he tool number 10 because he's a huge football fans and says that its the number his 'favourite playmakers' used to wear.

Re: Squad numbers

by Dave » 12 Jul 2012, 13:35

Squad numbers these days are no indication of who is higher up the pecking order, or likely to be in the first starting 11.

Many player prefer numbers for sentimental even supersitious reasons etc etc.

Re: Squad numbers

by cambgull » 12 Jul 2012, 13:32

Unless it signifies who's in the first team and who isn't...

Re: Squad numbers

by nicktufc » 12 Jul 2012, 13:22

If Bodin prefers 15 and Jarvis 8, then they may as well just be given those numbers

Re: Squad numbers

by Richinns » 12 Jul 2012, 12:57

I would have thought Bodin at 8 and Jarvis 15 but your right - no real surprises

Squad numbers

by Plymouth Gull » 12 Jul 2012, 12:53

On the OS now.

No real surprises;

Poke #1
Oastler #2
Lathrope #6
Jarvis #8
Bodin #15
Easton #18
Craig #20
Cruise #21

#4 is left available for the new CB, I guess.

Top