New deal for yeoman

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: New deal for yeoman

Re: New deal for yeoman

by clemy1989 » 24 May 2012, 07:21

good luck ash! hope he fulfills the potential shown in the reserve and youth teams. get him on the 7 man bench few sub appearences maybe start him in the jpt

Re: New deal for yeoman

by CP Gull » 23 May 2012, 19:14

New deal signed and sealed.

Now it's time for young Ashley to "put up or shut up" ..... in the words of the great man himself!

Re: New deal for yeoman

by ferrarilover » 22 May 2012, 22:47

Thanks, I was pretty sure it was required, but silly law do things differently to everyone else, and it's beginning to confuse me.

Matt.

Re: New deal for yeoman

by happytorq » 22 May 2012, 18:05

ferrarilover wrote:As opposed to keeping it busy with a joke so ancient, it's mentioned in the Old Testament... :devil:

Matt.

Grammar Nazis/religious extremists - is the capitalisation of 'Old' in Old Testament necessary?
Absolutely. It's a proper noun.

Re: New deal for yeoman

by stevegull » 22 May 2012, 15:21

ferrarilover wrote:As opposed to keeping it busy with a joke so ancient, it's mentioned in the Old Testament... :devil:

Matt.

Grammar Nazis/religious extremists - is the capitalisation of 'Old' in Old Testament necessary?
:lol: Fair enough!

For what it's worth, I think the capitalisation is necessary.

Re: New deal for yeoman

by ferrarilover » 22 May 2012, 15:16

As opposed to keeping it busy with a joke so ancient, it's mentioned in the Old Testament... :devil:

Matt.

Grammar Nazis/religious extremists - is the capitalisation of 'Old' in Old Testament necessary?

Re: New deal for yeoman

by stevegull » 22 May 2012, 14:55

ferrarilover wrote:Put it in your signature strip.

Matt.
Yeah, Matt keeps his busy boosting his ego. :lol: Joking!!!

Re: New deal for yeoman

by ferrarilover » 22 May 2012, 14:41

Put it in your signature strip.

Matt.

Re: New deal for yeoman

by usagullmichigan » 22 May 2012, 14:36

brucie wrote:Personally I would keep Atieno - he will score more goals than Jarvis thats for sure.
Can we pin this quote from brucie for this time next season.

Re: New deal for yeoman

by brucie » 22 May 2012, 14:17

Personally I would keep Atieno - he will score more goals than Jarvis thats for sure.

Re: New deal for yeoman

by royalgull » 22 May 2012, 11:13

What I mean by it is, those lads of 18+ have been signed on since we brought back our youth and reserve sides. They were the 14 and 15 year olds Plymouth, Exeter and Yeovil didn't want. So the likelihood of them then making it as first team regulars in my opinion is extremely slim. We have seen nothing from Halpin, Yeoman, Palmer and that group (the 18-20 year olds) to suggest even remotely otherwise.

The youth we have now from the 13 year olds up to the current young pro's just getting to 16/17 are the ones that in a few years might actually make the grade.

Re: New deal for yeoman

by numpte » 22 May 2012, 09:47

Well done to Yeoman, nothing like home grown talent.

I'd argue had we been puddling along in mid table the likes of Yeoman and Halpin might have got a better look in last year. But the more succesful we were the more Lingy had to play the tried and trusted to keep us up there.

Bit harsh that statement, anyone over 18+ is currenlty a waste of time.

Re: New deal for yeoman

by royalgull » 22 May 2012, 09:32

I am slightly surprised he's been kept on, 2 sub apps in about 4 years? 20 years old now and when we were chasing a game we sooner put Ellis up there than put Yeoman on.

Stay by my original thoughts, all the youth that are 18+ are a waste of time at the moment.

Re: New deal for yeoman

by Richinns » 22 May 2012, 09:32

brucie wrote:Absolutely pointless. Thats Atieno,Yeoman,Jarvis (probably) and Howe however long he stays fit. And Mcphee as back up.
Got a feeling he will be moving on brucie. No harm having Yeoman as 4th choice with the loan system if needed. Not like we have money to burn is it!

Re: New deal for yeoman

by royalgull » 22 May 2012, 09:28

Got us 5th this year! :)

Top