by SenorDingDong » 28 Apr 2017, 22:20
MellowYellow wrote: 28 Apr 2017, 19:06
I fondly recall a time that the Herald Express served its local community and Torquay Untied very well. Unfortunately that time has now long since passed.
It was only a decade ago, when after a tentative welcome to Chris Roberts, the paper turned on him and started printing many damning articles of what was going on, working in concert with the TUST and associated figures and accepting much information from them. They were prepared to do it then (admittedly under different owners - Daily Mail compared to Daily Mirror) in many cases using information fed to them by the fans, what is different this time? Are they scared of Clarke Osborne? Are they in bed with him - considering they will be running his consultation for him? The way the paper acted during the Roberts saga is exactly how it should be acting now and a great example of the local good a newspaper can do.
We have already done all the research for the HE, nothing we have stated is libellous in any court in the land - simply pure facts, all they need to do is reprint the facts without comment and let the public make up their own minds. As I've stated in my last post, Osborne's record is overwhelming in regards to telling you what he is, it doesn't even need commentary to persuade people. So no Dave Thomas, it's not as case of what you said in the last podcast, the Herald Express not reporting on social media 'rumours' as policy because print media is beholden to higher standards. Osborne can not sue you for printing a factual report of his business career. None of what I listed in my last post are 'rumours', they are verifiable facts that I easily found via 90 minutes research online, all published in reputable media outlets and you have a duty to publish them.
If the HE's reporting does not improve substantially in the next couple weeks I'll be the first in the queue for a formal boycott of the Herald Express.
[quote=MellowYellow post_id=204823 time=1493406371 user_id=22826]
I fondly recall a time that the Herald Express served its local community and Torquay Untied very well. Unfortunately that time has now long since passed.
[/quote]
It was only a decade ago, when after a tentative welcome to Chris Roberts, the paper turned on him and started printing many damning articles of what was going on, working in concert with the TUST and associated figures and accepting much information from them. They were prepared to do it then (admittedly under different owners - Daily Mail compared to Daily Mirror) in many cases using information fed to them by the fans, what is different this time? Are they scared of Clarke Osborne? Are they in bed with him - considering they will be running his consultation for him? The way the paper acted during the Roberts saga is exactly how it should be acting now and a great example of the local good a newspaper can do.
We have already done all the research for the HE, nothing we have stated is libellous in any court in the land - simply pure facts, all they need to do is reprint the facts without comment and let the public make up their own minds. As I've stated in my last post, Osborne's record is overwhelming in regards to telling you what he is, it doesn't even need commentary to persuade people. So no Dave Thomas, it's not as case of what you said in the last podcast, the Herald Express not reporting on social media 'rumours' as policy because print media is beholden to higher standards. Osborne can not sue you for printing a factual report of his business career. None of what I listed in my last post are 'rumours', they are verifiable facts that I easily found via 90 minutes research online, all published in reputable media outlets and you have a duty to publish them.
If the HE's reporting does not improve substantially in the next couple weeks I'll be the first in the queue for a formal boycott of the Herald Express.