The Disgraceful Player Fund

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Disgraceful Player Fund

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by Scott Brehaut » 01 Nov 2016, 18:25

Tomo - I hope you will also be flagging up the provocation received by him from others too?

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by tomogull » 01 Nov 2016, 17:06

Southampton Gull wrote:Nope. In fact it was more to do with posters saying they had missed some of his contributions. Matt is a decent bloke who sometimes posts in a way that offends people but so do a lot of others, myself included. I'd like to think that he can get his point across in a reasonable and articulate manner without the need to "spice" it up and while he sticks to his word he is very welcome back on here.
Is this the sort of 'reasonable and articualate' post you have in mind ?

Flat Cap - I've been absent from these shores for months. I've been back about 15 minutes. You've been lurking for ages and have only just now decided to post to say you don't want to post because I'm back. You could absolutely certainly make the Team GB Village Idiot squad.

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by Gullscorer » 27 Oct 2016, 15:17

By the way, Matt: :rules:

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by tomogull » 27 Oct 2016, 12:15

Gullscorer wrote:Agreed. Have to admit I missed Matt's contributions too.
I would slightly amend that to - Agreed. Have to admit I missed 60% of Matt's contributions too. ;-)

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by Gullscorer » 27 Oct 2016, 08:50

Agreed. Have to admit I missed Matt's contributions too.

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by Southampton Gull » 27 Oct 2016, 01:29

Nope. In fact it was more to do with posters saying they had missed some of his contributions. Matt is a decent bloke who sometimes posts in a way that offends people but so do a lot of others, myself included. I'd like to think that he can get his point across in a reasonable and articulate manner without the need to "spice" it up and while he sticks to his word he is very welcome back on here.

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by Gullscorer » 26 Oct 2016, 16:47

Southampton Gull wrote:Yes, very entertaining without going too far and in keeping with the conditions of him having his membership reinstated.
Nothing to do with you being desperate for more posters, then? ;-)

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by Southampton Gull » 26 Oct 2016, 15:28

It works by not swearing :)

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by ferrarilover » 26 Oct 2016, 13:35

'Ere Dave. Your swear filter, how does it work? Sometimes I say ****, or shit, or **** and it gets starred out, othertimes not.

Yours,

Confused of Bournemouth.

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by Southampton Gull » 26 Oct 2016, 12:27

Yes, very entertaining without going too far and in keeping with the conditions of him having his membership reinstated.

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by Gullscorer » 26 Oct 2016, 08:34

I agree with Ferrarilover (on this occasion..). A well-reasoned and perfectly measured post from him which brought a smile to my face (and that takes some doing). Good to have you back Matt. Now behave yourself.. :)

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by lucy6lucy » 26 Oct 2016, 01:03

ferrarilover wrote: #lolz

This is the problem with football clubs, people with absolutely no appreciation of reality get involved and get to make stupid statements like this one. I see you're a TUST member, it's going to be good fun watching you try to run the place for about 15 minutes.

The new website was created by two fans with a little knowledge and some free time. They spent their time on the internet doing something positive for the club as best they could, rather than talking ***** on a forum. Still, just so long as you've joined the Trust.

If we have a pot of money available to buy players, do you think the clubs selling those players would A) offer the player to us at fair market value or B) offer that player to us for exactly the amount of money we have available to spend?

Equally, if us and another club are in for a player and we publish how much we have available to spend on that player, do you think they'll A) bid what they were going to anyway, because using that information to their advantage just wouldn't be cricket or B) take our figure and add in an extra 50p?

Similarly, imagine a player's agent negotiating the wages for his client who wants to move to us, would he A) ask for an amount which his client would accept and the commission from which will pay for a weekend in a caravan on Anglesey or B) ask for twice that amount, knowing that's how much we have in the kitty and the commission from which will allow him to take his tart to Spain for a fortnight?

You're the selling club and have sold us a player (for more than he's worth, because we published our financial wellbeing online to appease some ******* gimp on a forum) and have negotiated as part of the deal, that the transfer fee shall remain undisclosed. Torquay then publish the figure in a roundabout way by updating the information on their website. Do you A) forget all about it, it was only harmless and it shows just what a shrewd deal you secured or B) Sue.

You're the Chairman of Torquay United. Your days are typically 14-16 hours in the office with an hour's commute either end. You have a wife, two teenage children and a spaniel called Rex. Your BMW needs taking in for its MOT, the new washing machine is being delivered on Tuesday, you've got to take Rex to the vet on Wednesday and you're already scheduled to be in meetings all week. After all, you run a whole football club, you're a busy, busy man. Some **** on the internet is giving you grief because he wants to know EXACTLY how your business spends its money, information to which he has no actual right, but has assumed a moral right for reasons known only to himself and his God. Do you A) stay late in the office, missing dinner and pissing off the wife who you're sure is already sleeping with the postman all to write an itemised list of every single penny that has come into and gone out of the PF in the last month, including the £1.84 that you borrowed to buy a donut and coffee this morning or B) ignore the baiting and get on with your actual job of running a football club.

To answer some of the other burning questions in this thread, I visited, of all the obscure and bizarre corners of the internet, the official website of Torquay United. I know, right, I mean, who the hell would think to look there?

Amazingly, within seconds, I found the following information. WARNING - THIS INFORMATION MAY SHOCK!

So how will the ‘Players Fund’ work?

We are asking for donations from anyone that can afford to donate money on a regular monthly basis or even a one-off donation. This money will be earmarked to go towards the cost of a player, or players, weekly wage(s).


And even more shockingly:

The Board of Directors will assure you that all monies received through this scheme will be used purely to assist [the manager] in building his squad.

So there we have it, the answer to what we spend the money on is right there and has been since the day the programme was launched some 18 months ago. It's been spent on signing Bliss and Reidy's loan and GG's relocation costs and, one time, when their digs at Thea's farm ran out of bog roll, Sparkesy ran to the local Co-op and bought some more and claimed it back on expenses.

Feel better now? Going to double your contribution now? No, didn't think so.

Matt.
Pretty good that :goodpost: the forum is much better with you back, incidentally have you kidnapped brucie

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by madgull » 25 Oct 2016, 23:56

ferrarilover wrote: Yes, but then we (you) voted Leave and being a bigot became de rigueur so they let me back in as Captain, Leader, Legend.
Whatever job you get when the meek inherit the Earth, it won't be English Comprehension Officer.

Matt.
I am so happy that you're back , Matt! :lol: :scarf:

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by TUST_Member_Rob » 25 Oct 2016, 21:18

ferrarilover wrote: Yes, but then we (you) voted Leave and being a bigot became de rigueur so they let me back in as Captain, Leader, Legend.
Whatever job you get when the meek inherit the Earth, it won't be English Comprehension Officer.

Matt.
a poor comeback for the time you've had on your hands!

The Disgraceful Player Fund

by ferrarilover » 25 Oct 2016, 19:46

TUST_Member_Rob wrote:I see this guy is back, didn't you get banned for being a racist and/or homophobic?
Yes, but then we (you) voted Leave and being a bigot became de rigueur so they let me back in as Captain, Leader, Legend.
TUST_Member_Rob wrote: and straight in with a dig at the mods on the fans forum topic, you've clearly been busy dreaming up those one liners during your ban!!
Whatever job you get when the meek inherit the Earth, it won't be English Comprehension Officer.

Matt.

Top