by hector » 24 Jul 2016, 09:22
As Dutchgull points out, David Thomas has been alarmingly slow on the uptake, preferring - it would appear - not to rock the boat. He seems to have a pretty dismissive attitude towards the TUST and his frankly ridiculous assertion - that many supporters fell for - that TUST is a glorified Supporters Club, either demonstrated complete ignorance of their purpose or intentional undermining.
Does he have the slightest awareness of the danger this football club faces from Gaming International? Has he expressed the degree of unease of supporters or displayed an ounce of journalistic nous to actually investigate what the future of TUFC might look like if GI succeed in buying the football club for their own profiteering wants?
He should be ringing great big alarm bells but he won't do that because that would be skirting on the edges of controversy and when does David Thomas ever do that? Maintaining a cosy, easy life is the name of the game for DT - not rocking the boat. If this was the Plymouth Herald, they would have been really delving into GI's murky past, if GI were looking into buying Plymouth Argyle. The Herald Express are always slow on the uptake. They were when Chris Roberts was running things, they were when Bill Phillips was doing his best to mess things up and they are now.
The very fact that - as the opening post on this thread seems to suggest - the onus seems to be on the Council is masking the issue that GI want the land, not the football club. If GI want our football club, then just buy it and build a new stadium regardless of what happens to Plainmoor after we depart it. That would be up to the council to deal with at that point.
Has it been explored why GI are holding a gun at the Council's head? Is it so the council be blamed if the deal falls through and the club are left owing GI money? Would that be the council's fault? I can imagine that is how it would be painted?
The fact that GI have been dilly-dallying around since March can hardly be blamed on the council.
David Thomas should be looking into the role of Peter Masters (rather than meekly accepting what the club say), into why GI have been given such a lengthy MOU but that would be acting like a journalist rather than virtually copying and pasting what appears on the TUFc website. The fact that DT has been so slow with this has meant those fans who only read the Herald do not have the same sense of urgency as those with access to forums. It's supporters who have been doing the journalistic digging, not the Herald Express.
As Dutchgull points out, David Thomas has been alarmingly slow on the uptake, preferring - it would appear - not to rock the boat. He seems to have a pretty dismissive attitude towards the TUST and his frankly ridiculous assertion - that many supporters fell for - that TUST is a glorified Supporters Club, either demonstrated complete ignorance of their purpose or intentional undermining.
Does he have the slightest awareness of the danger this football club faces from Gaming International? Has he expressed the degree of unease of supporters or displayed an ounce of journalistic nous to actually investigate what the future of TUFC might look like if GI succeed in buying the football club for their own profiteering wants?
He should be ringing great big alarm bells but he won't do that because that would be skirting on the edges of controversy and when does David Thomas ever do that? Maintaining a cosy, easy life is the name of the game for DT - not rocking the boat. If this was the Plymouth Herald, they would have been really delving into GI's murky past, if GI were looking into buying Plymouth Argyle. The Herald Express are always slow on the uptake. They were when Chris Roberts was running things, they were when Bill Phillips was doing his best to mess things up and they are now.
The very fact that - as the opening post on this thread seems to suggest - the onus seems to be on the Council is masking the issue that GI want the land, not the football club. If GI want our football club, then just buy it and build a new stadium regardless of what happens to Plainmoor after we depart it. That would be up to the council to deal with at that point.
Has it been explored why GI are holding a gun at the Council's head? Is it so the council be blamed if the deal falls through and the club are left owing GI money? Would that be the council's fault? I can imagine that is how it would be painted?
The fact that GI have been dilly-dallying around since March can hardly be blamed on the council.
David Thomas should be looking into the role of Peter Masters (rather than meekly accepting what the club say), into why GI have been given such a lengthy MOU but that would be acting like a journalist rather than virtually copying and pasting what appears on the TUFc website. The fact that DT has been so slow with this has meant those fans who only read the Herald do not have the same sense of urgency as those with access to forums. It's supporters who have been doing the journalistic digging, not the Herald Express.