Jerry wrote:
I don't know what you mean, Jezza, no double posting here. Have you been at the Mothers' Ruin? =D
Matt.
Added in 45 minutes 3 seconds:
tomogull wrote:Jack's postings (as this one) are well reasoned
Let us investigate this, since it was exactly the opposite that I was suggesting in my first post in the thread.
Jack wrote:OK you have all convinced me. We are doomed!
A gag to begin with. Fine. I might actually like this lad.
Jack wrote: We couldn't perform against two of the toughest teams in the division namely Gateshead and Tranmere.
Annoyingly, I wasn't at Tranmere, but talk of us not performing against Gateshead is cobblers <insert "no, that's Northampton" gag here>. We turned them into absolutely nothing more than 11 clodders. They were dreadful and we were comfortably the better side throughout. We'll play worse and win in the coming few months.
Jack wrote: If we can't mix it with the tough guys we aren't going to win games
This is doubly inaccurate. Firstly, we have comprehensively outplayed FGR twice, Cheltenham, Wrexham and Gateshead, all since the Christmas period and secondly, we need to beat the teams around us to stand a chance of staying up. February is the month for that.
Jack wrote: Our captain is far too passive on the field
You mean apart from the 11 (?) bookings? Nicky Wroe was a passive captain, Gus is not. He's no Roy Keane, but he does what he has to in the role. It's doubly hard for him, having his boss stood 30 feet to his left all the time. How is Gus to marshal the defence as captain with Nico out there doing the same as manager.
Jack wrote: He could also move the armband around from game to game to see if anyone can step up to the mark.
The worst idea since ideas began. If you've seen any professional sport ever, you'll know why. If you've ever experienced management at any level, on either side, in any walk of life, you'll know why.
Jack wrote: The second thing to do is to "cut the crap" from the website.
This was the bit where the voices in my head started urging me to kill and kill again. What does this even mean? Let's have a look at the last ten articles posted on the OS (I'm genuinely doing this blind, I haven't been to the OS for ages.)
We have, in headlines:
Make matchday extra special
Admission prices for the FA Trophy game
Ready to kick on
Marsh exit
Attendance v Gateshead
United fall despite being on top
Torquay 0 Gateshead 2
High Spirits
Tranmere 2 Torquay 1
Corporate Raffle
And a bonus 11th, since it's there, New club shop opening hours.
So, we've got two match reports, two pre-match summaries, details on a departing player, confirmation of some changes to the admission for a game where the prices have changed, one post match reaction, two adverts on behalf of the corporate division, one correction to an error made by the press association and one notice of changes to the opening times of the club shop.
What among that is crap?
Every club in the world produces match reports. It's basically the primary function of the website.
Similarly, every club publishes pre and post match statements from the players and management.
We've had an explanation from the club as to why they were forced to let go our top scorer.
They're advertising some revenue streams for the club which also happen to be beneficial to those who may with to have a meal before the match or take part in a corporate raffle.
They're passing on vital information such as changed admission costs and opening times.
What would you have them do? Not advertise the money making elements? I seem to recall the last Board failed to promote the Membership Scheme and were roundly (and rightly) badmouthed for it ON THIS VERY FORUM!
How about not producing match reports?
Perhaps the prices for the FA Trophy game should be kept a secret?
Maybe we should not tell anyone that the club shop won't be open as expected. I'm sure all the people reporting their wasted time and effort will do wonders for the club's position.
Maybe the Board should refuse to comment on or explain the reasoning behind some of the less popular or immediately obvious decisions (such as to sell Marsh)? Again, the previous Board did this and were given dogs abuse for it. Again, the majority of that abuse was both justified and made here, on
http://www.torquayfans.com/forum.
We've had months and years of whinging about poor communication from the club. The club starts communicating with fans and there is now more whinging.
The plain fact is that very little goes on at Torquay United, or any other club of our stature. At Man United, there's loads to report from their international scouting network, 1000s of youth and reserve squads, international sponsorship and corporate deals and the myriad other things that a vast multinational corporation has to spend its time on day-to-day. At Torquay, we turn up, train, go home. Steve Breed pays the gas bill and has a cup of tea while the cleaner runs a hoover round once a week. That's pretty much it. The rest is just the daily grind (Breedy, mate, I'm sure you'll read this. I know you do MUCH more than this, but none of it is worth reporting on. Keep up the excellent work).
Jack wrote: I think the daftest headline we have seen was the one last week about Murombedzi
You mean the one which was posted a clear 24 hours before anyone, even Dave himself, knew he was leaving the club. I've spoken to the club about this and they wish to offer the following statement:
"The Board of Torquay United would like to apologise to random internet gobshite Jack for the recent story relating to Dave Mourememembezedizizi, which appeared on our official website. The truth is that our crystal ball was in for its annual service and polish, rendering us completely unable to predict the future. Our efforts to sign one on a month's emergency loan from Peterborough United were frustrated by unusual electrical activity in the upper atmosphere. We thank fans for their understanding during this harrowing time and ask that our privacy is respected."
Happy now?
Jack wrote: The pre match ones are also far too optimistic and need to be toned down and also recognise that our opponents aren't just waiting to be rolled over.
End on a joke, that's always a good idea. Ending on two is even better.
Jack wrote: There is a danger that the manager and players believe all this stuff and don't prepare for games properly.
Oh, turns out you knew about the two joke thing. Kudos.
Jack wrote: It certainly raises expectations amongst supporters who react badly as they did on Saturday evening when we didn't "kick on" or whatever else we were supposed to do.
Alright, Billy **** Connolly, calm down. Two was enough. This isn't a bloody Jongleurs.
So no, Tomo, I'd say on this occasion Jack The Lad has failed miserably in his attempts at offering a "well reasoned" post and has, in preference, posted a load of old shite and a couple of (admittedly amusing) one liners.
Matt.