Lavercombe Fee?

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Lavercombe Fee?

Lavercombe Fee?

by TT78 » 07 Jan 2016, 14:50

There is another reason. The selling club may not want other clubs or agents knowing how much cash they had just received.

Lavercombe Fee?

by Gloomy Gull » 06 Jan 2016, 19:29

forevertufc wrote: It's quite simple, and nothing more than either the buying club or the selling, or both do not want any fee to become public knowledge, for various reasons, such as fan criticism, see torquayfans.com :)

Because either the buying club will be, perceived by their fans as having paid over market value, or the selling club, perceived by their fans as having sold under market value, but the thing with us football fans we really haven't got a clue how to value player in all honesty.

For the same, or other reasons, one or both clubs may not want to becoming subject to media scrutiny. However at the end of the day, if anyone of us was really that bothered, anyone could find out exactly what the transfer fee paid, was, with the good old internet, and knowing the right place to look, wink, wink.
Thanks for that Forever

Lavercombe Fee?

by Glostergull » 06 Jan 2016, 17:24

I doubt it can remain undisclosed for long. its bound to be part of the accounts and will somewhat stand out. unless of course it's put down to something creative like Hiring out Gilbert for after dinner squatting and hiring or office paper clips,. in which case we will never know. lol :lol:

Lavercombe Fee?

by Dave » 06 Jan 2016, 17:05

Gloomy Gull wrote: On a more serious note, does anyone know why fees are kept undisclosed? Once the deal is complete does it matter if the world knows the amounts involved - I understand any wage agreements being kept private. Just a question. :|
It's quite simple, and nothing more than either the buying club or the selling, or both do not want any fee to become public knowledge, for various reasons, such as fan criticism, see torquayfans.com :)

Because either the buying club will be, perceived by their fans as having paid over market value, or the selling club, perceived by their fans as having sold under market value, but the thing with us football fans we really haven't got a clue how to value player in all honesty.

For the same, or other reasons, one or both clubs may not want to becoming subject to media scrutiny. However at the end of the day, if anyone of us was really that bothered, anyone could find out exactly what the transfer fee paid, was, with the good old internet, and knowing the right place to look, wink, wink.

Lavercombe Fee?

by Gloomy Gull » 06 Jan 2016, 16:36

Bleeper wrote:As expected, it has jest been announced that Dan has joined Wigan Athletic for an undisclosed fee but will be returning on loan.

Could it be "undisclosed" because it is sooooo high we just wouldn't believe it !!!!!! :~D

On a more serious note, does anyone know why fees are kept undisclosed? Once the deal is complete does it matter if the world knows the amounts involved - I understand any wage agreements being kept private. Just a question. :|

Lavercombe Fee?

by tufc si » 06 Jan 2016, 14:51

chardie wrote: Do you have any actual knowledge of this transfer agreement or are you just here for a whinge?
Did you actually manage to understand then Chardie?!...

Lavercombe Fee?

by chardie » 06 Jan 2016, 14:09

MHSGULL wrote:For undisclosed read crap going by our history of giving away players.
Do you have any actual knowledge of this transfer agreement or are you just here for a whinge?

Lavercombe Fee?

by Forest gull » 06 Jan 2016, 13:10

Better to get a lower fee than not release players. Who would sign for a club if they don't let them move on to bigger clubs? We are a tiny little non league club who need players to come here hoping to get spotted.

Lavercombe Fee?

by WESTWARDGULL » 06 Jan 2016, 11:33

For undisclosed read crap going by our history of giving away players.

Lavercombe Fee?

by CraigUnder » 06 Jan 2016, 11:19

As expected, it has jest been announced that Dan has joined Wigan Athletic for an undisclosed fee but will be returning on loan.

Lavercombe Fee?

by nickbrod » 02 Jan 2016, 17:11

If he goes to Wigan what's the betting the fee will be 'undisclosed'?

Lavercombe Fee?

by Glostergull » 01 Jan 2016, 13:58

This was my argument a good while ago. whats the point of paying out a large sum of money for an academy when we get all the best poached by the bigger clubs for next to nothing.. yeah yeah so we get add ons. and how many of the add ons actually end up getting paid. They can find all sorts of ways of wriggling out of add on payments. I lost faith with that system a long time ago. Its much better to get a decent fee in the first place and then if he can progress good luck to the lad. We have fairly given him away and I bet you we won't see another penny for him ever.

Lavercombe Fee?

by Southampton Gull » 31 Dec 2015, 22:02

He made little or no difference to how many points weve achieved.

Lavercombe Fee?

by arcadia » 31 Dec 2015, 21:14

Dave_Pougher wrote:Somethings better than nothing and nothing is what we currently getting.
Credit where credits due KN (me giving KN credit whatever next) has played him consistently when it would have been easy to play okey kokey with the keepers. He knew the only revenue stream or best bet from the current crop of players was Lavercombe and its paid off, enough? Maybe not but he'll be asking to use what' cash is available that's for sure. His management career depends on it.


If he had played him earlier we would have more points on the board.

Lavercombe Fee?

by nickbrod » 31 Dec 2015, 18:35

I thought the fee was £30000 or is that wishful thinking? Weren't we 'told' recently that the club had squeezed an extra £15000 from the deal?

Top