by Dave » 18 Nov 2015, 17:56
I feel very sorry for Dave Phillips and Steve Breed, if the pair decide to chuck it in tomorrow I wouldn't blame them one bit, of course they won't, they are trying to save a football of which a small percentage of the fan base are morons.
What the previous regime did was spunk £200k of Thea's cash on a project doomed to failure before it even started, hell enough people warned them, probably could have spend less than a third on forchess cross, or Abbrook farm Kingsteignton , even upgraded the racecourse for pittance, after all it's not like the club had a proper contract or long term agreement on Seale Hayne, could have been kicked off at any point, all very well the old regime saying we had a gentleman's agreement with the land owner, what would have happened if the land owner had decided to sell his land to someone else.
As suggested above, I should imagine Plymouth put the money to upgrading their section of Seale Hayne, hence why their section is useable and ours is under water. Our board have taken a decision to stop spending good money after bad on something they can only use in the summer close season, makes perfect sense to me.
Would any of us pay rent for something you can't use ?
Of course a full time professional football clubs needs a fit for purpose training ground, that goes with saying, but our club has to have what it can afford. The current board are picking up the pieces of a previous regime who spent a few million pounds of Thea's money on rubbish, hence why we are now, where we are.
I feel very sorry for Dave Phillips and Steve Breed, if the pair decide to chuck it in tomorrow I wouldn't blame them one bit, of course they won't, they are trying to save a football of which a small percentage of the fan base are morons.
What the previous regime did was spunk £200k of Thea's cash on a project doomed to failure before it even started, hell enough people warned them, probably could have spend less than a third on forchess cross, or Abbrook farm Kingsteignton , even upgraded the racecourse for pittance, after all it's not like the club had a proper contract or long term agreement on Seale Hayne, could have been kicked off at any point, all very well the old regime saying we had a gentleman's agreement with the land owner, what would have happened if the land owner had decided to sell his land to someone else.
As suggested above, I should imagine Plymouth put the money to upgrading their section of Seale Hayne, hence why their section is useable and ours is under water. Our board have taken a decision to stop spending good money after bad on something they can only use in the summer close season, makes perfect sense to me.
Would any of us pay rent for something you can't use ?
Of course a full time professional football clubs needs a fit for purpose training ground, that goes with saying, but our club has to have what it can afford. The current board are picking up the pieces of a previous regime who spent a few million pounds of Thea's money on rubbish, hence why we are now, where we are.