Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by Dazza » 02 Oct 2015, 20:27

Rene Howe doesn't seem to have a club at the moment if Wiki is up to date.

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by RussianGull » 02 Oct 2015, 08:00

gullno4 wrote:unfortunately I don't think we'll be able pick and choose like that Russian! I fear he'll do well at Wrexham
No4 you're right, beggars can't be choosers and we are definitely close to being vagabonds.

Wrexham would be a good fit for him at the moment I think, if quite far from his parent club!

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by gullno4 » 02 Oct 2015, 07:53

unfortunately I don't think we'll be able pick and choose like that Russian! I fear he'll do well at Wrexham

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by RussianGull » 02 Oct 2015, 07:41

I liked Joe but it was probably the best decision for him as a player to go back to Bournemouth, whenever we sign a striker the first thing we do is wikipedia and check out his goals/apps, playing in a team that gives hardly any service up top makes him look worse than he is. I'd take him back on loan after January when we're in the top half of the table and we've got some decent delivery into the box.

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by tomogull » 01 Oct 2015, 21:24

I think with better service, which he will surely get at Wrexham, he will score goals. He was mostly expected to play a lone striker role for us and he hasn't had enough experience to fill that role. We shall see ....... Good luck to Joe, anyway.

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by nickbrod » 01 Oct 2015, 20:20

gullno4 wrote:I fear we've let him slip through the net, all the best to him though
"let him slip through the net", when we us he couldn't even find it!! (Ok once).

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by Dave » 01 Oct 2015, 18:24

Don't think it's a case of us letting Quigley slip through the net, there is clear imbalance in the squad. Don't see the point in having a loan striker taking up a space in the squad, when we can't defend for toffee, we keep getting over run in midfield and when the team do get there foot on the ball there's no one in there who can seem to pick a pass, so no supply.

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by gullno4 » 01 Oct 2015, 17:56

I fear we've let him slip through the net, all the best to him though

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by KeithMalone » 01 Oct 2015, 17:33

Quigley has gone on loan to Wrexham, will be interesting to see how many/if any goals he gets there

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by PhilGull » 24 Sep 2015, 22:41

stevegull wrote:Hate being one of 'those' people...

But I was slaughtered on here for suggesting that Fisher - Quigley wasn't an effective combination. One goal later and Quigley is off and you're all delighted.

I much prefer Fisher anyway, good in the air and seems to have a bit about him with the ball on the deck. He could well be the key to us having a side good enough to stay up. Just need some modicum of quality around him. Marsh could well be that man; I like the look of him so far.
At the start it seemed like they had both been brought in to compete for the job of leading the line, but then I guess someone made the decision to play both of them to get the best out of Ex's throws. Silly really.

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by stevegull » 24 Sep 2015, 22:28

Hate being one of 'those' people...

But I was slaughtered on here for suggesting that Fisher - Quigley wasn't an effective combination. One goal later and Quigley is off and you're all delighted.

I much prefer Fisher anyway, good in the air and seems to have a bit about him with the ball on the deck. He could well be the key to us having a side good enough to stay up. Just need some modicum of quality around him. Marsh could well be that man; I like the look of him so far.

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by Burnhamgull » 24 Sep 2015, 08:41

It's a shame to lose Quigley as I thought he held the ball up well and with the right support could have played in a Rene Howe type role as the figurehead of a 4-3-3 formation or even better as the target man in a 4-4-2.

You can't blame Bournemouth for recalling him though after everything that's happened in the past seven days.

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by tomogull » 23 Sep 2015, 19:42

forevertufc wrote: If these two going out leads to one striker coming in, with real pace and ability to score fairly regularly, see this as a positive.
If only, Forever. The problem is that every club from Man City down to Droylesden is looking for a striker with 'real pace and ability to score fairly regularly'. :goal: I think Quigley paired with Marsh with Murombedzi and Hurst out wide could have made us more effective up front. I don't think Quigley and Marsh ever played together but I may be wrong. Certainly the pairing of Quigley and Fisher didn't work. As for Alex Fisher, he's our top scorer but I'm still not sure what his best position is.

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by Trojan 67 » 23 Sep 2015, 19:32

kevgull wrote:Last night Hurst won more headers, had more shots and delivered more crosses than any of these two Strikers put together.

He's a right back, he can play right winger, could he make a striker?
Yes :-D

Quigley and Lavelle-Moore

by kevgull » 23 Sep 2015, 19:28

Last night Hurst won more headers, had more shots and delivered more crosses than any of these two Strikers put together.

He's a right back, he can play right winger, could he make a striker?

Top