Not in a hurry means.......

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Not in a hurry means.......

Not in a hurry means.......

by Richinns » 04 Jun 2014, 09:45

bobby93 wrote: This is spot on, and is the reason why I feel Martin Ling was the best man-manager we have had in recent years.

I think we need to be patient, Hargreaves has got a lot of convincing to do if he is to tempt players to come and ply their trade down here. A couple of names soon would be nice though, Buckle had no trouble in 2007. But then, he was "ambitious", wasn't he?
Buckle had no trouble because the loudest reasoning technique is the almighty dollar. Just like Eastleigh are having no trouble this year.
Money talks and currently Torquay are not in the position to be particularly 'chatty'.

Not in a hurry means.......

by bobby93 » 04 Jun 2014, 09:01

DerbyshireGull wrote:Absolutely GITP although I still reckon we have players that just haven't been used properly by all managers. Hawley has been disastrous for us but he did used to have a scoring record and that goal he scored v Morecambe was top drawer. I think he could do a job at conference level but we just haven't played him and Benners in the right manner and given them direct, fluent and consistent service. If it takes Van Persie 2 accurate crosses for him to get on the end of one and score then it takes Hawley about 15. If we don't get enough balls into dangerous areas then he isn't going to socre and then hangs back and ends up playing with his back to goal the entire game and we lump balls up to him to hold up. I'm not defending him in any way shape or form and Knill signed some dross but with weaker opposition and some fresh players then those like Hawley who we can't shift maybe just could be the answer in the conference. Part of it also lies with their attitude. It's a gamble but if we're stuck with them then we may as well try our hardest to get our money's worth this season.

We also shouldn't forget that there are a lot of players that were already here when Knill arrived that have been worse than some of his signings. At this level all managers have to sign poor or unproven players, it's then what you get out of them that matters. Sadly neither Knill nor Hargreaves could squeeze out enough.
This is spot on, and is the reason why I feel Martin Ling was the best man-manager we have had in recent years.

I think we need to be patient, Hargreaves has got a lot of convincing to do if he is to tempt players to come and ply their trade down here. A couple of names soon would be nice though, Buckle had no trouble in 2007. But then, he was "ambitious", wasn't he?

Not in a hurry means.......

by +mustard+ » 03 Jun 2014, 14:38

DerbyshireGull wrote:Leave it out mustard! Everyone knows our star player is Billy Bodin. :rofl:
Yes I've only just twigged what you posted. I like your humour. I hope Billy is recovering ok.

Not in a hurry means.......

by +mustard+ » 03 Jun 2014, 14:27

DerbyshireGull wrote:Leave it out mustard! Everyone knows our star player is Billy Bodin. :rofl:
I could not think of another player that was still on contract and wanted to stay

Not in a hurry means.......

by DerbyshireGull » 02 Jun 2014, 22:12

Leave it out mustard! Everyone knows our star player is Billy Bodin. :rofl:

Not in a hurry means.......

by ferrarilover » 02 Jun 2014, 22:08

+mustard+ wrote: Mr Ferrari Knill signed our star player on 1 August 13 so I would say he waited and got someone that nobody wanted.
You'd say it and you'd be wrong.

Matt.

Not in a hurry means.......

by Sunnysideup » 02 Jun 2014, 21:36

+mustard+ wrote: Mr Ferrari Knill signed our star player on 1 August 13 so I would say he waited and got someone that nobody wanted.
What makes you think that he was top of the list of strikers we tried to sign?
When the other targets dont agree contracts, you start to work your way down the list of players you want (and can afford).

Not in a hurry means.......

by +mustard+ » 02 Jun 2014, 20:48

ferrarilover wrote:Knill didn't wait long to attempt to deal last season.

Matt.
Mr Ferrari Knill signed our star player on 1 August 13 so I would say he waited and got someone that nobody wanted.

Not in a hurry means.......

by ferrarilover » 02 Jun 2014, 20:04

Knill didn't wait long to attempt to deal last season.

Matt.

Not in a hurry means.......

by +mustard+ » 02 Jun 2014, 19:24

Hargreaves needs to get his finger out as it's no good waiting for the so called best players as the ones without clubs are the ones no manager wants.
The last couple of weeks were the key times in a managers summer holiday(He does not get one) if he waits to long it will be the same as last season when Knill managed to get our star signing Carl Hawley. (£) It could be Phillips promise of a good budget was a con to get pressure off himself and the board.

Not in a hurry means.......

by ROADRUNNER » 02 Jun 2014, 18:37

No rich, know names as yet, but defo not them.

Not in a hurry means.......

by Richinns » 02 Jun 2014, 18:08

ROADRUNNER wrote:Two players, a winger and a striker are in advanced talks with ch.
Are these the guys who played in the trial game at the end of the season RR?

Not in a hurry means.......

by ROADRUNNER » 02 Jun 2014, 17:49

Two players, a winger and a striker are in advanced talks with ch.

Not in a hurry means.......

by DerbyshireGull » 02 Jun 2014, 11:32

Absolutely GITP although I still reckon we have players that just haven't been used properly by all managers. Hawley has been disastrous for us but he did used to have a scoring record and that goal he scored v Morecambe was top drawer. I think he could do a job at conference level but we just haven't played him and Benners in the right manner and given them direct, fluent and consistent service. If it takes Van Persie 2 accurate crosses for him to get on the end of one and score then it takes Hawley about 15. If we don't get enough balls into dangerous areas then he isn't going to socre and then hangs back and ends up playing with his back to goal the entire game and we lump balls up to him to hold up. I'm not defending him in any way shape or form and Knill signed some dross but with weaker opposition and some fresh players then those like Hawley who we can't shift maybe just could be the answer in the conference. Part of it also lies with their attitude. It's a gamble but if we're stuck with them then we may as well try our hardest to get our money's worth this season.

We also shouldn't forget that there are a lot of players that were already here when Knill arrived that have been worse than some of his signings. At this level all managers have to sign poor or unproven players, it's then what you get out of them that matters. Sadly neither Knill nor Hargreaves could squeeze out enough.

Not in a hurry means.......

by gullintwoplaces » 02 Jun 2014, 10:52

Just a thought. Is it possible that the pressure in the club to sign players has in the past influenced them to sign somebody, anybody? Might this have something to do with the inheritance that we now have from Alan Knill, who signed a donkey or two in desperation to sign anybody? The result, we now have some players that nobody else wants, including a striker that couldn't hit a barn door from two feet away.

Top