by bengull » 16 Nov 2013, 22:44
On the face of it a 2 year contract looks farcical given the circumstances but it was probably an extension of gratitude for helping us retain our league status and doing so without taking a wage. Ironically any pay off that occurs through sacking him could well act as the money he didn't earn at the back end of last season.
Neither the board nor the manager could have foreseen the horrendous financial constraints or huge budget slashing that came into effect over the summer, which completely handicapped AK's visions and sapped his resources. That said, he has still been backed as kindly as possible and the squad he has assembled should not be in the bottom two after a third of the season. AK is clearly not completely to blame for this malaise, though his selection policies and decision making certainly need justifying and explaining to me, however the big contract he is sitting on does not make the situation any easier for all parties concerned either.
On the face of it a 2 year contract looks farcical given the circumstances but it was probably an extension of gratitude for helping us retain our league status and doing so without taking a wage. Ironically any pay off that occurs through sacking him could well act as the money he didn't earn at the back end of last season.
Neither the board nor the manager could have foreseen the horrendous financial constraints or huge budget slashing that came into effect over the summer, which completely handicapped AK's visions and sapped his resources. That said, he has still been backed as kindly as possible and the squad he has assembled should not be in the bottom two after a third of the season. AK is clearly not completely to blame for this malaise, though his selection policies and decision making certainly need justifying and explaining to me, however the big contract he is sitting on does not make the situation any easier for all parties concerned either.