Paul McCallum

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Paul McCallum

Re: Paul McCallum

by Wisconsin_gull » 26 Oct 2013, 14:16

6'-3" ...Maybe we can use him as cover for our injured centre backs...

Re: Paul McCallum

by Colorado Gull » 26 Oct 2013, 08:19

The constant negativity and slating of our own club from our own fans, is rather quite depressing.

Re: Paul McCallum

by stefano » 26 Oct 2013, 01:03

supergulls wrote: I know the team for tomorrow as you will know but I never put it up here until after 1.30 which is the time the opposition get the team sheets but early enough before it's put out anywhere else.
Whoopee! Disaffected player? Or a girl hanging around the training ground looking at fit thighs? Got to be one or the other! ;-)

Re: Paul McCallum

by ferrarilover » 25 Oct 2013, 23:40

But I can think of an awful lot of Conference clubs who attract many more supporters than we do, pay more than we do, have more history and considerable geographical advantages over us, which was sort of a large part of the post you quoted...

Matt.

Re: Paul McCallum

by wodger of awabia » 25 Oct 2013, 20:32

ferrarilover wrote:We do aspire, of course we aspire, but we're limited by much more than a lack of aspiration. We're in a division of teams, teams like Burton Albion who can stretch to paying more than we can. We're in a division of players who are "forced" to sign for the highest bidder because they only earn normal money. The difference between £150,000/week and £200,000/week is, essentially, nothing. The difference between £1200/week and £1500/week is massive.
We can't compete with 90% of clubs in L2 in terms of money. Despite you and I knowing differently, we are, in the eyes of the young, mainly pretty stupid, mainly fairly simple men that we're trying to attract, geographically disadvantaged. We are historically challenged, we're not a fashionable club, we have no history, players, agents, friend and family probably think the same as the vast majority of the population, "Torquay United, aren't they a non-league side?"

We have f**k all to offer down here. As a young, black man interested in money, easy birds and nightclubbing, do you move to Bristol Rovers on two grand a week, or Torquay United on eight hundred?
Move to Rovers, you're surrounded by similarly minded individuals, in a place full of bimbos willing to throw themselves at a pro-footballer and you've plenty of cash in your pocket. You can tell your mates you're at Rovers, who are historically a decent and well supported club and one which ordinary people view as a 'big' club.
Contrast this with coming to us, stuck down here in God's waiting room, surrounded by the blue rinse brigade, with one dreadful nightclub and where you'll get laughed at for playing for TUFC, both by the girls and by your mates, who will think we're in the BSS and play pub sides on Sundays down the local rec.

Looking around the division today, it's a miracle that we're still here. Judging from the teams in the Conference, we should be, according to our size, fan base, budget and all those other practical considerations, languishing in the Skrill South. The fact that we aren't is miracle enough for me, without asking for more.
So no, it's not wrong to aspire to greatness or even mediocrity, but given the facts of the situation in which we find ourselves, it's not really wrong for us to be where we are, either.

Matt.
Can't think of any Skrill South teams with a fan base of 2,000 +

Re: Paul McCallum

by AustrianAndyGull » 25 Oct 2013, 19:32

ferrarilover wrote:We do aspire, of course we aspire, but we're limited by much more than a lack of aspiration. We're in a division of teams, teams like Burton Albion who can stretch to paying more than we can. We're in a division of players who are "forced" to sign for the highest bidder because they only earn normal money. The difference between £150,000/week and £200,000/week is, essentially, nothing. The difference between £1200/week and £1500/week is massive.
We can't compete with 90% of clubs in L2 in terms of money. Despite you and I knowing differently, we are, in the eyes of the young, mainly pretty stupid, mainly fairly simple men that we're trying to attract, geographically disadvantaged. We are historically challenged, we're not a fashionable club, we have no history, players, agents, friend and family probably think the same as the vast majority of the population, "Torquay United, aren't they a non-league side?"

We have f**k all to offer down here. As a young, black man interested in money, easy birds and nightclubbing, do you move to Bristol Rovers on two grand a week, or Torquay United on eight hundred?
Move to Rovers, you're surrounded by similarly minded individuals, in a place full of bimbos willing to throw themselves at a pro-footballer and you've plenty of cash in your pocket. You can tell your mates you're at Rovers, who are historically a decent and well supported club and one which ordinary people view as a 'big' club.
Contrast this with coming to us, stuck down here in God's waiting room, surrounded by the blue rinse brigade, with one dreadful nightclub and where you'll get laughed at for playing for TUFC, both by the girls and by your mates, who will think we're in the BSS and play pub sides on Sundays down the local rec.

Looking around the division today, it's a miracle that we're still here. Judging from the teams in the Conference, we should be, according to our size, fan base, budget and all those other practical considerations, languishing in the Skrill South. The fact that we aren't is miracle enough for me, without asking for more.
So no, it's not wrong to aspire to greatness or even mediocrity, but given the facts of the situation in which we find ourselves, it's not really wrong for us to be where we are, either.

Matt.

Matt, this is a superb post and now I think I am beginning to understand. I still think Knill should be doing much better with the players he has at his disposal and I cannot praise him thus far but in the grand scheme of things I sort of can appreciate in part what he is up against.

Re: Paul McCallum

by supergulls » 25 Oct 2013, 17:30

stefano wrote: A little rude about our manager that and I am sure it is not true. I thought he just looked on this forum a couple of hours before kick off to see what team Supergulls has picked! (as indeed I expect our opponents of the day do as well!) ;-)
I know the team for tomorrow as you will know but I never put it up here until after 1.30 which is the time the opposition get the team sheets but early enough before it's put out anywhere else.

Re: Paul McCallum

by Gullscorer » 25 Oct 2013, 17:20

:goodpost:

Re: Paul McCallum

by nickbrod » 25 Oct 2013, 17:19

I agree with Matt's assessment of what a Torquay fan should expect. After 48 years of following the Gulls nothing much has really changed throughout these years ie good, exciting seasons flirting with promotion, average mid-table fare and scary bottom of the table relegation fears.
Support for the club has always been a smallish hard core and floaters who turn up for the occasional big matches. If over the course of this season we finish in the bottom two then that's our level however I still believe Knill and Brass will enable us to avoid that senario.
My real concern is why the team can't play for 90+ minutes as we seem to manage only one half a match. Tomorrow, playing against 'big' opposition should enable us to raise our game and with a big attendance anything is possible!

Re: Paul McCallum

by ferrarilover » 25 Oct 2013, 16:49

We do aspire, of course we aspire, but we're limited by much more than a lack of aspiration. We're in a division of teams, teams like Burton Albion who can stretch to paying more than we can. We're in a division of players who are "forced" to sign for the highest bidder because they only earn normal money. The difference between £150,000/week and £200,000/week is, essentially, nothing. The difference between £1200/week and £1500/week is massive.
We can't compete with 90% of clubs in L2 in terms of money. Despite you and I knowing differently, we are, in the eyes of the young, mainly pretty stupid, mainly fairly simple men that we're trying to attract, geographically disadvantaged. We are historically challenged, we're not a fashionable club, we have no history, players, agents, friend and family probably think the same as the vast majority of the population, "Torquay United, aren't they a non-league side?"

We have **** all to offer down here. As a young, black man interested in money, easy birds and nightclubbing, do you move to Bristol Rovers on two grand a week, or Torquay United on eight hundred?
Move to Rovers, you're surrounded by similarly minded individuals, in a place full of bimbos willing to throw themselves at a pro-footballer and you've plenty of cash in your pocket. You can tell your mates you're at Rovers, who are historically a decent and well supported club and one which ordinary people view as a 'big' club.
Contrast this with coming to us, stuck down here in God's waiting room, surrounded by the blue rinse brigade, with one dreadful nightclub and where you'll get laughed at for playing for TUFC, both by the girls and by your mates, who will think we're in the BSS and play pub sides on Sundays down the local rec.

Looking around the division today, it's a miracle that we're still here. Judging from the teams in the Conference, we should be, according to our size, fan base, budget and all those other practical considerations, languishing in the Skrill South. The fact that we aren't is miracle enough for me, without asking for more.
So no, it's not wrong to aspire to greatness or even mediocrity, but given the facts of the situation in which we find ourselves, it's not really wrong for us to be where we are, either.

Matt.

Re: Paul McCallum

by Southampton Gull » 25 Oct 2013, 16:21

Tomo, I don't think anybody believes any different to yourself in regards to the position we find ourselves in at the moment, the thing that sets you apart from the village idiots is that you were not clamouring for the Manager to be sacked before we'd played 10 games.

You hit the nail on the head when you said that if we're still in this position come January then that will be the time to think about decisions like getting in a new manager. I'd agree totally with that.

Re: Paul McCallum

by tomogull » 25 Oct 2013, 16:16

ferrarilover wrote: It's short termism at its worst and it will end up costing the club more than it makes them, but it's what must be done because of the way the game has gone over the last few years. More and more idiots have louder and louder voices and "fans" of clubs like ours expect to see rousing displays, top of the table clashes and promotions every week. They forget that 99.9% of our existence has been in the division we presently inhabit and that 99.9% of our future will likely be spent here too. They want promotion becvause that's what they think is the minimum aceptable standard, so to be where we normally are (somewhere near the bottom of Division 4) is somehow now a fauilure. Matt.
Well, call me a village idiot if you like, but I disagree with this. I think the majority of fans accepted this was going to be a consolidation season where we expected to be around halfway in the table. We weren't expecting 'top of the table' clashes. Neither were we expecting to see 'rousing displays' every week. What we were expecting to see was some sort of stability and a reasonable game of football played with desire and commitment but what we've seen is the complete opposite. I can't word it any better than Andy's summing up of the Burton game which hasn't been challenged by any who were there on Tuesday night - There was nothing. No ingenuity, no cohesion, no creativity, no passion, no energy, no ideas, no leaders, no gameplan, no interest, no chances. This description applies to most of this season's matches. I don't accept that we should be 'somewhere near the bottom of Division 4'. We're a well run club in my opinion and should aspire to better things.

I'm certainly not calling for Alan Knill to go, but the present apparent disarray at the club can't be allowed to continue for too much longer.

Re: Paul McCallum

by AustrianAndyGull » 25 Oct 2013, 16:08

:-D

I sort of knew. I am a bit but not for the sake of it. I just love being involved at games and I get frustrated. I'm black and white thinking again though! :'(

Re: Paul McCallum

by Southampton Gull » 25 Oct 2013, 16:05

Andy, in no way was I insinuating you were one of the miserable moaning little barstewards.

Re: Paul McCallum

by AustrianAndyGull » 25 Oct 2013, 16:04

As someone who thinks Knill is doing a desperately sh*t job I wouldn't say my wholehearted vocal support through much of the games at Morecambe, Northampton, Fleetwood, Wycombe and Burton would render me a negative influence on our team or club. Why must we all be grumpy, moaning, cynical, anodyne, depressing people if we think the manager is crap? Is it some sort of default setting?

I get behind the team 100% EVERYWHERE AND ALL GAME but i'm a village idiot for holding an honest opinion based on what I have seen so far which is a man who is paid to manage our football club isn't doing a very good job of it. I don't think anyone can say he IS doing a good job of it so then how are we village idiots and how do proactive vocal supportive fans like myself make games a negative experience for the players?

Top