by Dave_Pougher » 24 Mar 2013, 16:45
Thats sad but I have to say after the initial start it's as if the TUST didn't exist. Don't mean to criticize and I'm sure the pioneers had good intentions and worked very hard with a few good projects coming to fruition.
Always had a dream that an independent TQY trust would be formed with one objective, buying the ground from the council so never again could we be subject to a scenario of the Roberts/Bateson variety.
Is it feasible, would the board agree, I don't know but wouldn't be easy which ever way you look at it but would love to see something of the like happen.
Thats sad but I have to say after the initial start it's as if the TUST didn't exist. Don't mean to criticize and I'm sure the pioneers had good intentions and worked very hard with a few good projects coming to fruition.
Always had a dream that an independent TQY trust would be formed with one objective, buying the ground from the council so never again could we be subject to a scenario of the Roberts/Bateson variety.
Is it feasible, would the board agree, I don't know but wouldn't be easy which ever way you look at it but would love to see something of the like happen.