Page 3 of 4

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 13:01
by ferrarilover
cambgull wrote:You've just tried to argue against him by making the exact same point as him...
If you don't follow, perhaps don't try to join in.

Matt.

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 13:03
by Southampton Gull
ferrarilover wrote: If you don't follow, perhaps don't try to join in.

Matt.

You two crack me up, ever considered a civil ceremony? :lol:

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 13:12
by ferrarilover
Trouble is, as soon as I said 'I do' he'd bloody we'll argue that I don't!

Matt.

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 13:19
by Southampton Gull
ferrarilover wrote:Trouble is, as soon as I said 'I do' he'd bloody we'll argue that I don't!

Matt.

See? Pwopper cuppal alweddy :lol:

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 21 Jan 2012, 02:10
by cambgull
ferrarilover wrote: If you don't follow, perhaps don't try to join in.

Matt.
It isn't my fault you lost all track of what you were arguing about and who's side you were on. That's pretty special for a lawyer, I think I might call you Lionel Hutz from now on.
ferrarilover wrote:Trouble is, as soon as I said 'I do' he'd bloody we'll argue that I don't!

Matt.
Absolute rubbish, I'd never let you say 'I do' first.

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 21 Jan 2012, 02:38
by ferrarilover
That is likely true, they do ask the woman first...

And you're still wrong (there's a surprise) about my facts post. I shan't explain it here, it would be insulting to those who have grasped my very obvious point with consummate ease. (Louis, we need a *pokes Cambgull with stick* smiley).

Matt.

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 21 Jan 2012, 04:36
by cambgull
ferrarilover wrote:That is likely true, they do ask the woman first...

And you're still wrong (there's a surprise) about my facts post. I shan't explain it here, it would be insulting to those who have grasped my very obvious point with consummate ease. (Louis, we need a *pokes Cambgull with stick* smiley).

Matt.
There's no way I'd be the woman in our relationship Matt, that would mean you actually managed to get some p*ssy. Also, I've seen your picture. Girly face, added to the girly car. If there isn't a closet homosexual in there I'll eat my hat!

I'm not really wrong at all on your facts post, you first made a statement about a "credible rumour" which you rightly got called out for, then proceeded to make a post about facts being credible as if to gloss over your mistake. So what was this "very obvious point" then? The fact that you got it wrong, then confirmed what Aussie had told you but in a way to suggest that it had been your point in the first place. Nice attempt at NLP though, I'll give you that! :-D

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 21 Jan 2012, 10:40
by Aussie
Southampton Gull wrote:Nice to see you settling in, Aussie :rofl: :rofl:
Trying my hardest not to bite! Matt is kind of strange and I`m not sure where he is coming from sometimes!

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 21 Jan 2012, 11:12
by Scott Brehaut
Aussie,

What you have to remember with Matt is that he will argue that white is black - he is never, ever wrong.

You can either accept that, and just laugh to yourself reading the clear nonsense that often comes from his mouth (he can't help it, he is a (trainee) lawyer after all), or you can go the way of Cambgull and get frustrated arguing with him constantly. Either way it makes for an entertaining read for me that's for sure.

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 21 Jan 2012, 12:06
by cambgull
I never feel frustrated arguing with him, I actually quite enjoy it!

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 21 Jan 2012, 19:33
by Southampton Gull
Aussie wrote: Trying my hardest not to bite! Matt is kind of strange and I`m not sure where he is coming from sometimes!
Think of him as our very own Gok Wan ;-)

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 21 Jan 2012, 19:40
by Scott Brehaut
Southampton Gull wrote: Think of him as our very own Gok Wan ;-)
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 21 Jan 2012, 22:33
by usagullmichigan
Think of him as our very own Gok Wan ;-)[/quote]

And there is a anagram in there for Matt aswell

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 28 Jan 2012, 19:10
by tufcbrett
No idea if its true or not. But i was told after the game that Jakey has been training with us this week. Also this is going on because Bodin doesnt look like to be coming back It was mentioned in the Family stand.

Anyone know anything? Im just intrested to know if theres any truth to this or not.

Re: Jake Robinson.

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 12:30
by knh31667
tufcbrett wrote:No idea if its true or not. But i was told after the game that Jakey has been training with us this week. Also this is going on because Bodin doesnt look like to be coming back It was mentioned in the Family stand.

Anyone know anything? Im just intrested to know if theres any truth to this or not.



i heard the same